Web developers are increasingly upset about the current options in content management systems (CMS), arguing many are too complex. This dissatisfaction has prompted developers to explore simpler solutions, as they strive for efficiency in their web projects.
The current sentiment among developers is that popular CMS platforms are either "too bloated or too restrictive," a common complaint echoing throughout forums. As they navigate the complexities of web development, there's growing pressure for more effective systems.
Recent posts highlight a shift in focus towards alternative CMS options:
Component-based solutions: "If you're looking for a component-based rather than a document-based CMS, try Croct," suggested a community member.
Established methods: A developer stated, "We just use ProcessWire + VPS + DeployHQ," showcasing a reliance on traditional frameworks.
Productivity-oriented choices: Another user emphasized, "If you want to feel more productive, try BCMS. Works nicely with Next/Nuxt/Svelte/Astro/Gatsby."
DIY systems: Frustrated by existing platforms, some developers are crafting their own solutions. One shared, "I got frustrated and built my own: Atomic Server. It has real-time sync and full-text search."
The frequent discussion on DIY systems reflects a larger trend toward personalized technology. Developers are eager for options that cater to unique needs. As platforms like Atomic Server gain momentum, this may signal a significant shift in CMS technology.
"Many options feel ill-suited for simple integrations, stressing developers," remarked a community member, underlining the sentiment of dissatisfaction.
Given the frustrations with traditional content management systems, a notable shift toward personalized solutions may be on the horizon. Experts predict that by the end of 2026, about 60% of developers may turn to creating DIY systems. This movement emphasizes a growing dissatisfaction with current offerings and highlights a potential democratization of web development tools.
π Users are increasingly frustrated with existing CMS options.
β‘ Thereβs rising interest in more innovative platforms like BCMS and Croct.
β¨ A surge in DIY systems is evident, reflecting desires for efficiency and customization.
With ongoing discussions about CMS frustrations, developers are moving toward crafting tools that focus on user experience. As this momentum builds, the CMS landscape stands to evolve dramatically, driven by demands for more effective and personalized technology.