A growing number of people are raising alarm bells about the safety of Crypto.comβs DeFi Wallet, particularly regarding self-custody. Concerns center on asset ownership, decentralization, and the effectiveness of various wallet features, with mixed user feedback shaping the debate.
Many are weighing the decision to switch from the main app to the DeFi Wallet. Key questions include:
Is the wallet genuinely non-custodial?
Do users truly own their assets?
How reliable are staking options and DApp connections?
Opinions within user boards are divided. One user affirmed, "Yes! DeFi wallet is non-custodial." Others warned, "No. Any DeFi hot wallet like this isnβt safe. Consider using your Ledger for security,β highlighting safety concerns with hot wallets.
Another commenter noted, βIf you want to use it securely, connect your Ledger device to the DeFi Wallet." This indicates that while the wallet is viewed as a hot wallet, enhanced security measures can be taken with hardware integration.
Dependability is a key focus. Users emphasize the importance of safeguarding private keys. Negative experiences regarding bugs and slow support are still prevalent, causing hesitation among new users. Some people praise the wallet's features but voice regret over technical limitations.
Positive reviews highlight control and potential management of assets.
Negative feedback persists over making the service reliable for long-term use.
Mixed feelings about safety and customer service prevail in discussions.
π "Keep your keys safe," remains a top cautionary note from users.
β οΈ Reports of bugs indicate a need for system improvements.
β "Do you feel safe using it long term?" echoes through feedback.
With these discussions ongoing, itβs vital to see how Crypto.com addresses these safety concerns as the user community navigates the evolving landscape of crypto safety in 2025.