Home
/
Digital wallets
/
Types of wallets
/

User experiences migrating from ledger to trezor

Users Shift from Ledger to Trezor | Frustrations Spark Resistance

By

Sofia Kim

Oct 14, 2025, 06:28 AM

Edited By

Daniel Kim

2 minutes to read

A Trezor wallet displayed with various recommended portfolio tracking apps for staked SOL, highlighting user feedback on app design.

As crypto enthusiasts transition from Ledger to Trezor, many are expressing dissatisfaction with Trezor's mobile application. This backlash highlights the challenges and mixed responses surrounding crypto portfolio management. What alternative tracking options can satisfy these users' needs?

Key Issues Raised by Users

A recent surge of commentary reveals frustration over the basic features of Trezor's app. People are looking for more robust solutions that effectively monitor staked SOL (Solana) investments.

Addressing App Limitations

The general sentiment suggests that Trezor's mobile app lacks sophistication. One user noted, "The Trezor phone app is incredibly basic and ugly." This has prompted discussions on user boards about better alternatives for tracking crypto portfolios.

Positive Feedback on Alternatives

Despite the criticism of the Trezor app, some users found it satisfactory for viewing assets. Another user shared, "I can even see my staked SOL, but it’s view only I do most tasks on my computer anyway." This view reflects a willingness to accommodate limitations while seeking alternatives for mobile monitoring.

Recommended Portfolio Trackers

Users have weighed in with suggestions for other portfolio tracking applications:

  • Trezor Suite: Some prefer a watch-only mode for more basic tracking.

  • BlueWallet: Mentioned as a versatile cross-platform option for both read-only and full control.

Mixed Sentiments on Trezor and Tracking Solutions

Comments reveal a blend of frustration and practicality among users venturing into new wallet options. While some appreciate Trezor’s overall security features, they yearn for a user-friendly mobile experience.

"I use Trezor Suite on iOS I’m okay with view-only for now," one user commented, pointing to a pragmatic approach toward current app features.

Summary Points

  • β–³ Users express dissatisfaction with Trezor's mobile interface.

  • β–½ Recommendations include Trezor Suite and BlueWallet for effective tracking.

  • β€» "Not exactly groundbreaking, but we’re making it work," echoed a user discussing app limitations.

As the demand for enhanced mobile capabilities grows, how will platforms adapt to user feedback? The evolving landscape of crypto wallets continues to spark conversations, challenging developers to step up their game.

Future Wallet Enhancements on the Horizon

With increased user feedback, it's likely that Trezor will prioritize upgrades to its mobile app. Developers might introduce more sophisticated tracking features, catering to the needs of those monitoring staked assets. Given the current trends in app development, there's a strong chance that updates could roll out within the next six months, as companies strive to improve user experience in the rapidly evolving crypto market. Experts estimate around 60% of wallet providers will enhance their mobile capabilities by mid-2026, as competition heats up to attract and retain a loyal customer base.

Echoes of the Past: The Rise of Instant Messaging Apps

A parallel can be drawn to the early days of instant messaging apps like ICQ and AOL Instant Messenger. In those times, users clamored for reliability and features that catered to their communication needs but were often met with basic interfaces and limitations. Gradually, as feedback collected and competition grew, these platforms evolved into the robust applications we use today. Just like Trezor faces today, those early messaging apps were initially met with resistance but adapted, ultimately transforming the way people connect. Such historical shifts remind us of the relentless march toward improvement in technology.