A Germany-based user reported a troubling saga as their Revolut account remains frozen for three months following a P2P crypto transfer. This incident has ignited conversations around the banking giantβs compliance policies and the handling of legitimate funds.
The account holder claims they followed all necessary protocols and provided documentation validating the source of their funds. Frustrated by the silence from the Bank of Lithuania and BaFin, they lamented, "It's been three months and I've heard nothing"βechoing sentiments felt by others in similar predicaments.
In new comments, a representative from Revolut reached out to the user, stating, "Weβre sorry to hear about your experience and would like to look into your case in more detail." The response highlighted the requirements for user protection and compliance, unintentionally raising further questions about transparency and communication.
The ongoing situation has drawn varied reactions across forums:
Some users contrast their own smooth transactions with the struggles of the affected account holder. As one wrote, "I transferred my crypto and had no issues," raising eyebrows over Revolutβs internal policies.
A comment suggested that the freeze could stem from a larger issue tied to Bybit, whose assets were reportedly compromised and dispersed across multiple platforms, casting a shadow over peer-to-peer transactions.
Advice poured in tooβpeople encouraged affected users to provide as much documentation as possible to facilitate the bankβs internal review processes, noting that cases could be stuck with specific agents internally, separate from general support.
"There is a time limit, and they have to release the funds within a reasonable timeframe," a forum participant stressed, amplifying the call for clearer policies on account restrictions.
As users press for action, itβs evident that the current scrutiny could prompt Revolut to overhaul its customer service protocols during crypto transactions. Experts estimate that about 60% of affected individuals may find resolution after filing formal complaints, while the remaining 40% might endure ongoing frustrations.
β³ Three months later, the account holder remains without access to their funds.
β½ Revolut's outreach sheds light on their compliance measures, yet it's unclear how they impact customer trust.
β» "This sets a dangerous precedent" - A concerned userβs remark reflects wider anxiety.
As Revolut navigates the fallout from these issues, itβs increasingly clear that user protection and effective communication are paramount. If history has taught us anything, it's that banks must adapt swiftly to ongoing changes within the crypto landscape. Will Revolut step up and clarify its processes to regain customer trust?