Hashrate Confusion: Discrepancies Emerge in gupax Data | What Users Need to Know
Edited By
Samantha Lee
A growing number of people are questioning the validity of hashrate readings from gupax, sparking conversations across forums. Reports suggest different values for the same process, leaving many confused about which figure to trust.
What’s the Problem?
In recent discussions, many have pointed out the stark differences in reported hashrates. For instance, the XMRig section notes a rate of 1800 over 15 minutes, while P2Pool shows a much higher figure of 2800.
"Just keep an eye on the 10 and 60 second hash rates on XMRig. That’s the true hash rate," said one commenter. They pointed out that P2Pool calculates its hashrate based on lower difficulty shares to maintain accurate tracking of connected miners.
User Concerns About P2Pool Tracking
Amidst the discrepancies, users raised concerns about P2Pool's syncing status. One user expressed frustration that their status indicator never turned green, indicating synchronization issues lasting over a day.
"Is it normal for the status indicator for P2Pool to never turn green?" they asked, highlighting a common concern among many engaged in the mining process.
What the Numbers Mean
Reliability of XMRig: The consensus suggests that for actual hashrate values, XMRig operates more reliably compared to P2Pool.
P2Pool’s Calculated Rates: The different calculations stem from its method of tracking miners through share submissions, which some deem an unreliable measure.
Syncing Concerns: Users are skeptical about P2Pool’s ability to sync, with many wondering how long the process should realistically take.
"Over time, P2Pool's reported hash rate will converge towards XMRig's," noted another source.
Key Insights
🔹 Most people agree that XMRig provides a more accurate measure of hashrate.
🔸 P2Pool's methods create confusion due to fluctuating rate calculations.
🚩 Users are frustrated with prolonged synchronization issues, impacting efficiency.
As discussions continue on various user boards, clarity surrounding these issues remains paramount for people engaged in crypto mining. Curiously, will these discrepancies encourage changes in how these platforms report their figures?