Edited By
Sofia Markov
A significant concern has emerged among developers regarding the generation of Program Derived Addresses (PDAs) in Solana. A recent discussion highlighted the risk of potential address conflicts, sparking varied reactions and insights from community members.
When a program generates a PDA using a specific seed, like the month "2025-04"
, issues can arise if an attacker uses a subsequent seed, such as "2025-05"
. Developers warn this can lead to conflicts where existing addresses hinder new program logic. One contributor noted, "It means a lot if they generate your privkey in the process." This raises alarms about the robustness of the seed algorithm.
Discourse among developers reveals several key points worth noting:
Program Ownership: "Your PDA always has your program ID. Even if an attacker generates the same PDA, it doesnβt matter. Only the program that owns the account can pass its PDA to others."
Predictability Issues: Some developers raised concerns about how predictable this process can be, questioning if the generation method allows for easy exploitation.
Feedback on Entropy Keys: One comment bluntly criticized the approach of generating entropy keys, stating, "Oh hell no are you generating your own awful entropy keys? Holy shit!"
Overall, responses show a mix of optimism and caution regarding PDA generation. While some newcomers expressed relief, stating, "When two programs generate two PDAs, they will never generate the same address, even if they use the same seed," the core issue remains the legitimacy and security of the underlying algorithm.
"Thanks, Iβm new to Solana. I just did a test, and youβre right!" β New developer's affirmation.
π Consistency in PDA Generation: Programs uniquely tie their addresses to an ID, reducing conflict chances.
β οΈ Potential Vulnerability: Concerns linger about predictable patterns in address generation.
π οΈ Focus on Security: Developers emphasize the need for secure methods to avoid address overlaps.
Is the community doing enough to address these concerns or will conflicts continue to plague Solanaβs development? Developers seem split, suggesting a deeper look into PDA security is necessary as the platform evolves.