Edited By
Raj Patel
A growing wave of frustration is sweeping through the custom mobile operating system community as Revolut, the popular banking app, restricts access for users running alternative ROMs. This phenomenon, reported intensively since March 2025, sparks discussions over user autonomy versus corporate control.
The recent Discord among Revolut users highlights a significant issue: the appβs ban on devices using custom ROMs. Specific groups, notably those on Graphene OS and e/OS, have flagged their inability to access core features. Users are raising eyebrowsβwhy is a secure alternative penalized while stock systems face no such scrutiny?
An anxious user lamented, "I thought I was safe on e/OS, but here we are, stuck with limited options." As the situation escalates, many feel corneredβforcing them to consider downgrading the app or even switching phones altogether. This dissent isnβt isolated; it reflects a larger concern revolving around user rights in the digital age.
Discontent is bubbling, with three key themes surfacing in the commentary. Many users express dissatisfaction with the appβs limitation on crucial features, while others ponder a possible switch to older devices just to access the service. Thereβs also a cautious optimism, with reports suggesting that workarounds may soon emerge, particularly from the developers behind Graphene OS.
"Just a heads-up, it works on GrapheneOS again", shared one user, providing a glimmer of hope amidst the chaos.
Sentiment among users notably varies, oscillating between frustration and tentative solutions. As comments rolled in, the prevalent mood leaned toward negativity, with many exploring alternatives like completely abandoning trusts with Revolut.
As users evaluate their optionsβwhether to modify their current systems or revert to older stock ROMsβthe conversation escalates. The implications stretch beyond personal convenience; they touch on a vital topic: how much control should apps have over the devices that run them? More than a mere technical setback, this ban raises ethical questions concerning choice and accessibility in app usage.
β Many users are contemplating closing their accounts due to functionality issues.
β Users are sharing workarounds, especially on GrapheneOS, suggesting resilience amidst challenges.
β° "Just sucks that I will need to port so much stuff over," reflects ongoing anxiety regarding app transition.
As the dust settles, the community remains in a state of flux. Revolut users, backed into a corner, are actively seeking solutions, whether through software workarounds or other financial apps that cater to their needs. Interestingly, the evolving landscape of app security and user rights continues to intertwine closely, leaving everyone on edge as they navigate these modern banking waters.