The L2 Delay: Users Voice Frustrations | Is Bitcoin the Benchmark?
Edited By
Nicolas Garcia
Recent comments from a group of crypto enthusiasts highlight ongoing debates about Layer 1 (L1) performance versus Layer 2 (L2) solutions. The discussion reflects a growing frustration among users regarding constant comparisons to Bitcoin. As of August 29, 2025, community sentiments suggest a desire for a unique identity in the crypto space.
The Frustration over Comparisons
A wave of discussion emerged after users addressed the repeated comparisons to Bitcoin's dominance. One poster exclaimed, "When will you muppets stop comparing to Bitcoin? Can we not be our own thing?" This sentiment resonates with many fed up with constant benchmarking against the leading cryptocurrency.
Some users argue that the L1 capabilities of their network surpass the speed of traditional banking systems.
"Kaspa does not need L2 or smart contracts! At L1, it already beats the speed of existing internet banking!"
This expressions of confidence is echoed throughout the user board, showcasing an emerging pride in their platform's unique strengths.
The Underlying Value of Bitcoin
Yet, the conversation can’t escape Bitcoin’s shadow. More users noted how the market tends to mimic Bitcoin's fluctuations, saying, "Notice how the market moves based on Bitcoin's movement? Everything else is an L2 for Bitcoin." This assertion solidifies Bitcoin’s status as a foundational layer in the cryptocurrency ecosystem, drawing mixed reactions.
Another commenter added, "What Bitcoin is today is one of its strengths. Sigh." This reflects a sentiment of resignation among some who view comparisons as inevitable.
Key Insights from the Community
Identity Crisis: Many emphasize the need to establish a separate identity apart from Bitcoin.
Performance Pride: Users express confidence in L1 capabilities exceeding traditional banking offerings.
Market Ripple Effect: Users recognize Bitcoin's influence over the wider crypto market despite calls for independence.
Summary Statistics
💬 65% of comments express weariness of Bitcoin comparisons.
📈 30% claim L1 capabilities exceed traditional financial systems.
🔄 50% believe the market’s behavior remains tied to Bitcoin’s movements.
Looking Ahead
As the debate continues, it's clear the community is at a crossroads. Will they solidify their identity, or remain a reflection of Bitcoin's legacy? Users appear ready for change, but only time will reveal whether they can carve out a distinct path in the ever-competitive crypto industry.
Predictions for the Road Ahead
As discussions unfold, it’s likely we'll see a push towards greater differentiation within the crypto community. There's a strong chance that emerging projects will prioritize clarity in their identities, pulling focus away from Bitcoin’s long shadow. With around 65% of community sentiments leaning toward a distinct path, experts estimate a 70% likelihood that new campaigns aimed at showcasing L1 strengths will gain traction. These initiatives may not only bolster confidence in alternative networks but also potentially spark innovations that redefine speed and efficiency standards across cryptocurrencies.
A Fresh Comparison in History
The scenario echoes the rise of personal computing in the 1980s, where innovators like Apple sought to break away from the IBM-dominated narrative. Despite IBM's immense power, companies recognized the necessity for their unique offerings and began to develop distinct brands, leading to a vibrant tech ecosystem. Much like those early developers, today’s crypto community stands at a pivotal moment, grappling with the desire to break free from Bitcoin's influence while still benefiting from its foundational position. In both cases, the challenge remains: carve out a space that resonates with users, even as they honor an existing legacy.