Home
/
News
/
Crypto analysis
/

Concerns over mstr, circle, coinbase, and tether reserves

A growing coalition of people is voicing skepticism about the claimed reserves of major crypto firms such as MicroStrategy (MSTR), Circle, Coinbase, and Tether. The debate over whether these companies truly possess the Bitcoin they assert continues to heat up, amplified by the latest comments on various forums.

By

James O'Connor

Apr 27, 2025, 09:37 AM

Updated

Apr 28, 2025, 01:43 PM

2 minutes to read

Logos of MSTR, Circle, Coinbase, and Tether overlaid with a question mark symbolizing concerns about transparency

Audit Limitations Under Scrutiny

Discussions highlight that while MSTR and Coinbase undergo audits, they focus on transaction history instead of direct confirmations of asset ownership. As one commenter noted: "They just check the history, not the wallets." This raises concerns about the potential for unnoticed discrepancies in reported assets.

Interestingly, one critical observer asked, "What keeps them from faking those transactions, printing counterfeited digital dollars, inflating their value, and proving ownership of the same assets multiple times in different companies?" Such skepticism drives discussions about the validity of audits and the actual reserves held by these firms.

Circle's Reserves and Future Aspirations

Circle recently attempted to return to the public landscape after abandoning its ambitions in late 2022. They assert significant reserves in USDC, but skepticism remains. One commenter stated: "Until Circle's reserves are properly audited, we have no idea if the funds they’re claiming are actually theirs." This brings to light the ongoing need for transparency in their financial declarations.

Tether's Attestations Under Fire

Tether's frequent attestations, rather than comprehensive audits, provoke questions about their credibility. Observers are echoing concerns raised by others, asking: "They market these attestations as audits, but what do they really mean?" This reliance on seemingly inconclusive reports adds fuel to doubt among crypto enthusiasts.

Transactions Between MSTR and Circle: A Concern

The interaction between MSTR and Circle also raises eyebrows. Questions such as "What keeps them from faking transactions?" illustrate a growing belief that the lack of adequate auditing raises further risk of inflated claims of ownership and potential manipulation. A keen observer elaborated, "If MSTR’s investment thesis is sound, why are the biggest holders of Bitcoin selling them so much right now?"

Key Takeaways

  • 🚩 Both MSTR and Coinbase audits rely on transaction history, not ownership confirmation.

  • πŸ“‰ "Circle’s reserves are still unverified; proper audits are essential," say skeptics.

  • ❓ Concerns persist about transaction integrity, especially between MSTR and Circle.

  • ⚠️ The ongoing reliance on attestations instead of full audits raises skepticism about Tether's credibility.

The demand for transparency is noticeably growing, with many people pushing for more concrete proof regarding these firms' claims. As the situation evolves, the crypto community remains alert to developments.