Traders are increasingly questioning the 1% trading fees associated with Photon, with many debating whether it's wise to shift to cost-effective platforms like Jupiter. Recent comments have introduced more alternatives for users looking to avoid high transaction costs.
Some traders remain unhappy with Photon. One user bluntly stated, "I used only once and was enough, fees will fk u up," highlighting dissatisfaction with the rates. A consensus has emerged among others who echo similar frustrations, suggesting the high fees are unfair.
Among the options being discussed, LoFeeBot is gaining traction. Users suggest it provides a more economical way to trade by incurring no fees on buys and only charging for sells. A notable comment read, "I made it mainly for myself but itβs open for others to use if they wanna avoid stupidly high fees from Photon, BullX etc."
Additionally, there's buzz around alpsnipes, an auto sniper bot featured on Telegram. This custom bot allows traders to purchase new tokens automatically, boasting features like honeypot checks and minimum liquidity assessments.
"Check out alpsnipes on Telegram if youβre interested in a custom bot."
π° High Fees Draw Criticism: Users continue to express discontent over Photonβs steep charges, deeming them excessive.
π Cost-Effective Alternatives: Platforms like LoFeeBot are recommended as they facilitate trades without high fees.
π Tech Innovations: Custom trading bots like alpsnipes create new opportunities for trading safety and efficiency.
Curiously, while the conversation around Photonβs fees intensifies, the introduction of these new tools may shift user loyalty away from traditional platforms. As more users circulate on forums discussing these alternatives, the pressure on Photon to adapt increases.
As competition heats up in 2025, analysts project that dissatisfaction with Photon could lead to a significant exodus to lower-cost options. If Photon fails to adjust its fee structure, it might see around 60% of users explore alternatives like LoFeeBot by yearβs end.
The ongoing conversation showcases not just the impact of trading fees but also how tech innovations can alter the landscape of cryptocurrency trading. As the community continues to strategize and share experiences, platforms will have to rethink their user engagement strategies to remain competitive.
The evolution of user needs reflects broader market dynamics, where dissatisfaction with trading fees can catalyze the rise of new technology and alternatives. Given the rapid changes, itβs clear that traders are ready for more than just a basic trading experience. Would Photon be able to keep up before losing its user base altogether?