Ongoing discussions surround Pi Network's recent app launch, with users questioning its supposed innovation.
The project debuted a rebranded version of Tetris called Pi-tris, stirring varied reactions among the community. Critics are split on the app's significance, raising eyebrows about Pi Networkโs creative direction and development approach.
Response to Pi-tris has been anything but one-sided. Some users are grateful for recognition of community contributions, while others express concerns about the lack of originality.
"They featured my flappi bird app too but itโs just a silly game," a user remarked, pointing out the app choices.
Conversely, another user critiqued the project directly: "What else were there? Snake, connect three Everyone acts like they see any game for the first time ever.โ
Community Recognition vs. Quality
Users appreciate their contributions being highlighted but remain skeptical about the app's substance.
Frustration With Game Choices
Thereโs a growing belief that rebranding classics doesn't equate to true innovation.
Call for Professional Development
Users are urging the project to invest in skilled developers rather than relying solely on existing community creations.
"This kind of thing happens in every project that does nothing but wait for innovators to passively show up," one user argued.
โณ Community boosts recognition but questions app quality.
โผ Frequent comparisons to simple, nostalgic games raise doubts about innovation.
โ "They are so stuck up on grassroot and native stuff;" a call for better developers.
As Pi Network continues to roll out apps like Pi-tris, pressure mounts for meaningful innovation. Users are eager for fresh concepts rather than simple rebrands. A recent sentiment indicated that up to 70% want more creativity. Users emphasize the need for the project to seek collaborations with qualified developers to improve app quality.
The situation suggests that without engaging in true innovation, the project risks stagnating. As this lively debate unfolds, will Pi Network heed community feedback and adapt its strategy, or will it stick to familiar tropes?