
A growing coalition of users is pushing back against the PCT's failure to eliminate deceptive ads from its official Telegram channel, which boasts 3 million subscribers. Many are concerned that newcomers may inadvertently surrender sensitive information to scammers, especially following a rise in hacks involving compromised accounts. The issue escalates as users express frustration over the apparent inability of PCT to manage such ads.
The ongoing presence of a suspected scam ad in the channel has sparked considerable anxiety among community members. "Unfortunately, they can't control the ad section, the scammers are smart though," remarked one user, encapsulating the sentiment of helplessness many feel. Community discussions highlight the challenges in ad placement on platforms like Telegram, where advertisers can pay to run ads without thorough oversight from the platform.
One comment expressed, "The scammers are paying to run it on Telegram. PCT can only warn people." This notion emphasizes the structural limitations PCT faces while addressing these rampant scams. Curiously, some users have identified that clicking on the scam ad may redirect unsuspecting individuals to the scammer's channel, intensifying the urgency for action.
Amid the frustrations, community voices are not silent. Many are calling for more significant oversight of advertisements, alongside a shared responsibility to safeguard personal data. "It's our responsibility to keep our finances safe," a user noted, suggesting the necessity of user vigilance. However, others feel PCT has a duty to educate users effectively.
"If they put a message in the main app homescreenβto not enter the seed anywhere else besides the Pi browserβI can say they did their job," commented one user, advocating for proactive measures that could minimize user errors and scams alike.
"The last time they let a bad ad slip, it only caused chaos," one user stated, reflecting concern about the potential fallout from complacency.
Some users still believe that a collective effort in reporting these ads could prompt Telegram to take serious action. "If guys have Telegram, go and report that ad; maybe if they receive many reports, they will remove it," advised another member, highlighting the importance of community engagement.
As this situation evolves, the looming risks to community safety remain a pressing issue, compounded by a notable rise in phishing scams. Users are navigating a perilous environment, where a compromised seed phrase could lead to irreversible losses. With these ads possibly serving as gateways for attackers, the responses from both PCT and Telegram are more crucial than ever.
β οΈ 3 million subscribers might inadvertently expose sensitive information.
π Users emphasize the need for stronger ad control from PCT, with calls for more direct messaging.
π’ Collective reporting initiatives could lead to effective action against scam ads.
π€ Many believe PCT may not fully understand the extent of user risks β itβs an ongoing conversation.
The urgency to cleanse these fraudulent ads from a platform meant to foster community trust grows with each passing day. Will PCT respond effectively to safeguard user interests before more damage is done?