Edited By
Samantha Lee
A curious situation is brewing among crypto enthusiasts as they grapple with the nuances of semi-private coins. Complaints surfaced this week when one user faced a persistent anonymity score stagnating at 88%, raising questions about privacy in the coinjoin process. Why canβt they hit the elusive 100%?
One user shared his experience with a popular wallet, expressing frustration over the seemingly incomplete privacy features.
"I tried coinjoining and it stays at 88% does this mean my coins are not anonymous?"
Experts chimed in on forums, clarifying that the key issue lies in the number of participation rounds in the coinjoin service. If the coins are labeled as semi-private, it often means they did not engage enough to achieve a stronger anonymity score.
Three main themes emerged from user forums:
Anonymity Scores: Many believe 88% isnβt enough for untraceable transactions, with some claiming it lacks true privacy.
Participating Effectively: Users are encouraged to engage in multiple coinjoining rounds to improve their anonymity scores, as single attempts may not suffice.
Transaction Intent: Comments indicate various goals, such as wanting to consolidate outputs versus maintaining a high privacy threshold.
The debate raises the question: Is 100% privacy the goal, or is a respectable anonymity score sufficient for most users? While some argue itβs crucial to pursue full privacy, others suggest that a solid score offers adequate protection without the anxiety of reaching perfection.
β³ Users report confusion over semi-private status despite a good anonymity score.
β½ Engaging in multiple rounds may enhance privacy without needing to hit 100%.
β» "If you want untraceable payments, 88% can already work for you." - Forum expert.
As criticisms about privacy features continue, it seems clear: understanding the intricacies of semi-private coins is essential for anyone seeking anonymity in crypto transactions.