Home
/
Market insights
/
Market analysis
/

High rates: who is borrowing stable coins at 30%?

Borrowing Stable Coins at Eye-Watering Rates | Users Weigh In on Market Moves

By

Alice Chen

Jun 7, 2025, 09:37 AM

Edited By

Olivia Brown

3 minutes to read

A person sitting at a desk with a calculator and laptop, looking at loan details related to stable coins, concerned about high interest rates.
popular

In a surprising twist, the borrowing rates for stable coins on various platforms have skyrocketed to between 23% and 33%. As some people jump on the borrowing train, questions arise about their strategies to make these high costs worthwhile.

Context of Growing Interest

The significant rates are causing a stir, particularly on the Liqwid platform. With such high borrowing costs, many wonder why anyone would take on these loans. "What are you doing with the loans to be more profitable than the borrow rate?" users ask, hinting at the potential risks involved.

What Users Are Saying

People are sharing a mix of strategies and concerns regarding these new borrowing dynamics. Here are three notable themes that have emerged:

  1. Risky Strategies for Profit

Some people are adopting strategies to leverage loans for potential gains. "Supply ada. Borrow stable. Swap it for more ada," one user suggested, indicating a long position in hopes that ADA’s value will increase. Another hinted at leveraging on platforms like STRIKE.

  1. Incentives for Lenders vs. Borrowers

Several comments express skepticism about the sustainability of these high rates. One person noted, "It’s so high to incentivize more liquidity and disincentivize borrowing." This implies that lenders might be capitalizing on perceived risks, keeping interest rates elevated.

  1. The Need for More Liquidity

Concerns about liquidity also surfaced, with one comment mentioning, "I believe order matching takes a while because low liquidity so APR is high." There’s a growing need for more lenders to bring rates down further.

"Too high in my opinion. Needs more lenders."

Sentiment Patterns

Overall, the sentiment appears mixed. Users seem cautiously optimistic, yet there are underlying fears regarding the sustainability of the current rates and market conditions. While some view borrowing as an opportunity, others caution that these high costs might lead to a risky gamble for many.

Key Points

  • πŸ”Ό Users are exploring risky borrowing strategies to leverage ADA gains.

  • πŸ”½ High rates are designed to attract more lenders but discourage borrowing.

  • πŸ’° Liquidity issues contribute to the elevated APR, suggesting a need for more lenders.

This is a developing story as people navigate this fluctuating market. Only time will tell how these borrowing strategies impact the cryptocurrency landscape.

Next Steps in the Borrowing Landscape

There's a strong chance that borrowing rates will stabilize or even decrease in the coming months as more lenders enter the market. Experts estimate that if liquidity increases, we could see rates drop by 10% to 15%, making borrowing more attractive for some. However, if skepticism persists and fewer people are willing to borrow at these rates, it could lead to a stagnation in growth. Attention from institutional investors could also shift the dynamics, pushing rates higher as demand increases. The trajectory will largely depend on people’s confidence in crypto’s future and their willingness to engage with the current high costs.

A Lesson from the Housing Bubble

The current situation can be likened to the housing market before the 2008 financial crisis, where easy credit encouraged risky investments. Borrowers during that period believed rising home values would buffer their financial maneuvers. People adopted similar strategies, often leveraging loans against property, only to face dire consequences. However, while the perils of the housing market led to widespread fallout, the crypto landscape can pivot faster, with technological innovation allowing immediate adjustments. This fluidity means that while risks exist, the outcomes can differ dramatically, making today’s borrowing strategies a fascinating reflection of past errors while holding potential for adaptation.