A growing coalition of people is casting doubt on the security of their XDC cryptocurrency holdings due to the lack of a hardware wallet option. Confusion arises from competing services that claim to be the original XDC wallet, leading to debates about which one to trust.
For years, one wallet provider has promised a hardware solution for XDC, but tangible results are still lacking. Some users are now considering transferring their funds to alternatives perceived as more secure. A participant commented, "I wouldnβt trust anyone saying theyβre the original anything. Just get it off the internet and onto a hardware wallet."
The conversation on various forums reveals three major themes:
Trust in Alternatives: Users are turning to various wallet options. One commenter noted, "TANGEM wallet holds it just fine highly recommend it."
Continued Uncertainty: Thereβs confusion regarding which wallet is truly better, especially with nearly identical services available. A participant stated, "You cannot put XDC on the Ledger, unfortunately. You can use the wallet above and connect the Ledger but not directly have it on Ledger Live."
Demand for Clarity: People want clear information. One member remarked, "If you Google it, it explains well on their website," indicating that clarity is currently missing.
Overall, sentiment is mixed. While some express distrust in existing wallets, many still trust XDC as a cryptocurrency. Users are asking if these wallets can improve transparency to better assure their clients.
π Users challenge the security claims of current wallets, pushing for alternatives.
π Many are adapting by using wallets like Tangem and DβCENT for XDC management.
π Confusion remains over which wallet is genuinely secure and the upgrade process.
As community discussions broaden about the reliability of wallet services, the demand for better solutions grows. Will more users make the leap to secure their investments as security concerns escalate?